![]() Even with lightroom sharpness at 0, it still maintains more detail than OV3 (look under the eyelids). I've noticed this at 100% in other images also. OV3 seems to go bonkers with the noise reduction and turns fine detail into mush. Natural profile doesn't seem able to replicate OV3 16Bit Tiff exactly and Adobe Standard is way off.ģ. compared to OV3 16Bit Tiff but could easily be dialed back a notch.Ģ. The colours are very slightly increased in saturation in the lightroom pic on Vivid. Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)ġ. Export both at JPG for Resize to fit 1024 pixels with Sharpen for Screen Amount Standard with JPG quality at 100% ![]() Imported same RAW into Olympus Viewer 3, exported as 16Bit TIFF, then imported into Lightroomģ. Imported RAW into Lightroom (I use "copy" rather than "Copy as DNG" - unsure what the difference is)Ģ. I may switch to Natural with a slight boost in saturation in the future thoughġ. ![]() ![]() Note: The in-camera picture mode is also Vivid on the camera if that makes a different to Olympus settings. Camera Calibration Process 2012 (Current) Profile Camera Vivid Sharpness 25 / Radius 1.0 / Detail 25 / Masking 0 I noticed the noise was a bit high but I put that down to my default import profile being at 25 sharpness.Īnyway I've read all about Olympus Viewer 3 being excellent (including Robin Wong and forums here) so I thought I'd give it a go - these are pics taken on 75mm 1.8 at 1/50sec shutter and ISO 3200 focused on nearest eye. I've been using Lightroom 5 (recently 6) import into RAW and I've been generally happy with it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |